My sister-in-law was ill with the flu a few weeks ago and
needed to get back on her feet quickly to go back to work. My immediate
response was to encourage her to ask her doctor for Tamiflu which is a drug that
works to treat the inconvenient symptoms of the flu virus. But does the
convenience of symptom solving drugs create a future of inconveniences? According
to chapters eight through ten the answer is probably.
Being a History major, I like to apply everything we learn
in class to where it might fit most appropriately on a historical timeline. As
nerdy as this may make me the biggest event I could associate with these
readings was the Black Death. A disease spread through massive population
shifts to urban environments and through the transmission of rats the plague
was one of the most deadly events in human history. Of course, people of that
time believe that the plague was a punishment bestowed by God. Now we are able
to determine the spread of disease that facilitate events like these. This also
holds true for the increase in disease as a result of the industrial revolution
that the chapters mention. Closer contact with animals and people, the settling
of towns, and changes in diets are all factors that increase the spread of
disease.
These events bring us to today. We still have epidemics like
the most recent flu which claimed multiple lives this year. It makes me wonder
that if epidemics of the past claimed nearly a third of the population (black
death) is it better to treat just the symptoms so that we can quickly return to
our day to day activities or should we let our bodies natural response take
over. Personally, I think drugs like Tamiflu and Dayquil should be used in
moderation although I am certainly guilty of overusing them in an attempt to go
to work or school sooner. Maybe I should take a dose of my own “natural”
medicine instead.
No comments:
Post a Comment