I agree with Sarah Kempel’s findings on the first reading (7
Myths) but I happen to disagree with her opinion on the second reading
(Hunter-Gather). The 7 Myths article
discloses an argument that coincides with a slight increase in activity and a decrease
in sedentary activity would help steer an individual towards the right
direction of being healthier. As well,
the article about hunter gathers more supports that ancestral activity is less
likely to be full of strenuous activity and more adaptive to intermediate or
less than intermediate activity. The
second article is placing the focus on the presumptions of ancestral activity
and denouncing the held belief that earlier hominids had a metabolism that was
different from ours that helped to offset the low calorie intake and the high-level
of physical exertion. The article is not
placing emphasis on the fact that modern humans have sufficient activity to
maintain their health levels. I do agree
though that both conversations were interpreted in this article.
After class this Wednesday I was thinking about the
correlation in non-sedentary lifestyle and health. I reviewed some people in my life that I have
interacted with that I would consider visually unhealthy but have been deemed
healthy as well as the opposing. This
does hold so truth with these experiences and I would consider that sedentary lifestyle
is inversely proportional to overall health.
My mother, whom is 61, probably has a BMI a few points above 25 but she
has no cardiovascular problems. This is
probably because she’s lived with my father on a farm for 40 years. She maintains the yard and tends our garden
which is considered good forms of exercise.
No comments:
Post a Comment